tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4487834052004001845.post8156769859529740431..comments2023-04-05T00:41:39.483-04:00Comments on 1975 Topps (it's far out, man): #320 - Pete Rosenight owlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11673973790245316059noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4487834052004001845.post-66730979865853571382021-07-07T10:00:07.327-04:002021-07-07T10:00:07.327-04:007 years in a row of double digit HRs - I would hav...7 years in a row of double digit HRs - I would have lost that bet all day longNickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17556694134545568157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4487834052004001845.post-59082864762277403552010-09-22T10:32:24.999-04:002010-09-22T10:32:24.999-04:00i really dislike this card. it's crooked and ...i really dislike this card. it's crooked and the angles of the basepaths are all out of whack and it's a red and all that. although i was/am a fan of pete rose, or at least what he did on the field.gcrlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09882449679093991427noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4487834052004001845.post-62994068816109795382010-09-22T02:23:08.917-04:002010-09-22T02:23:08.917-04:00I feel myself slipping out of my chair just lookin...I feel myself slipping out of my chair just looking at that background. I've always had the feeling Rose was overcompensated with talent because he got short changed in intelligence. I think you're right to be picky about that error. It's glaring.Play at the Platehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14231140141558021698noreply@blogger.com